The FDA Just Got a New Boss, and Folks , I am WORRIED
Trump just finished stacking three of the most consequential health jobs in the country with a conspiracy theorist, a TV doctor, and now an anti-abortion staffer — and somehow the résumé gap keeps getting more absurd with each hire. Here's what happens when "loyal" becomes the only qualification that matters.


The FDA Just Got a New Boss, and Reader, I Have Concerns
Let's review the roster so far. First, Donald Trump handed the keys to Health and Human Services to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a man whose relationship with scientific consensus is roughly that of a cat's relationship with a bathtub. Then he installed Dr. Mehmet Oz — a TV personality, for those keeping score — atop the agency that oversees Medicare and Medicaid, presumably because someone needs to explain deductibles during a commercial break. And now, ladies and gentlemen, please welcome Heidi Overton, an anti-abortion Trump staffer, stepping up to run the Food and Drug Administration.
Kennedy. Oz. Overton. Say it three times fast and it sounds like a law firm that specializes exclusively in losing your case. Three wildly important jobs, three wildly mismatched résumés, and one single unifying qualification that ties them all together like a bow on a gift nobody asked for: Donald Trump believes they will do what Donald Trump tells them to do.
Trump called Overton a "rockstar." I feel qualified to weigh in here, having spent a fair chunk of my life around actual rock stars, and I can confirm: this is not that. In Trump-speak, a "rockstar" is not someone with blistering talent, independent judgment, or the nerve to improvise when the amps catch fire. A Trump rockstar is someone who plays his song, in his key, at his tempo, and never once turns around to mention that he's several octaves out of tune.
Here's the part where I remind you the FDA is not a ceremonial position where a nice person cuts a ribbon, smiles for the cameras, and occasionally pops onto Fox News to say nice things about the boss. This is the agency responsible for whether your medicine, your child's vaccine, your hip replacement, and the lunch meat in your fridge are safe. It touches every medicine cabinet, grocery cart, hospital, and pediatrician's office in the country. Its actual job description involves the phrase "science-based information," not "vibes-based information," which is an important distinction, because when the FDA gets it wrong, people don't just grumble about government — they get sick. Children become vulnerable. Patients lose treatments. People die. This is not a department where you want the institutional equivalent of someone learning to drive stick.
Now, in fairness — and I include this because I don't need to invent anything to make this case land — Overton is, genuinely, a physician. Medical degree from the University of New Mexico. A Ph.D. in clinical investigation from Johns Hopkins. Board-certified in public health and preventive medicine. These are real credentials, earned the hard way, and I will not pretend otherwise just to make a joke land harder.
But here's the thing about medical degrees: they do not come pre-loaded with the ability to run an agency that regulates roughly one-fifth of the entire American consumer economy. Overton has no visible experience managing an organization anywhere near the FDA's size, no track record directing thousands of scientists and regulators, and no history steering the famously labyrinthine process by which drugs and vaccines actually get approved. Even Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy — not exactly a member of the resistance — has cited her lack of managerial experience as one of his "strong concerns." This is not a job where she can learn the machinery on the fly while Kennedy whispers pseudoscience in one ear and Trump bellows demands in the other. That is not on-the-job training. That is a hostage situation with a dental plan.
Her defenders offer this reassurance, and I want you to sit with how low a bar it is: she is willing to read medical literature, and capable of changing her mind when shown new evidence. Astonishing. Groundbreaking. Perhaps next we'll learn she owns a functioning pen and can sit through an entire meeting without leaving. The actual question isn't whether Overton can read studies. It's whether she'll stand by them when they collide with Trump's gut instincts, Kennedy's conspiracy slideshow, or the demands of the anti-abortion movement. Nothing in her record suggests she will. A medical degree doesn't get more impressive when it's mainly being used as a lab coat for someone else's dogma.
Exhibit A: Overton stood beaming next to Trump when he announced his plan to gut the childhood vaccine schedule, space out shots, and split the MMR vaccine into three separate appointments, against the advice of essentially every relevant medical body on Earth. She called this "historic." I would call it historic in the way a shipwreck is historic. She was right there when Trump revived the zombie theory linking vaccines to autism — a claim so thoroughly debunked it should have its own headstone — and apparently no amount of settled science can survive contact with a presidential hunch and a Kennedy PowerPoint. Cassidy called her involvement in that announcement "almost disqualifying." Almost? If helping promote unsupported policy that could leave kids exposed to preventable disease is only almost disqualifying, I genuinely need to know what the full, un-almost version looks like. A parade?
Then there's mifepristone, the abortion medication Overton has publicly criticized, which the FDA approved back in 2000 and has repeatedly reaffirmed as safe and effective through multiple reviews. Soon, she may be the person deciding its fate. This is exactly where the wheels come off. If there's new, credible evidence, fine — examine it, that's literally the job. But if the conclusion was written in advance by an ideological agenda and the "review" is just a scavenger hunt for anything that can be twisted to support it, you haven't got science anymore. You've got theology with a stethoscope.
And she's inheriting an agency already on fire. More than 3,000 staff have reportedly left in the past year, including senior experts and division heads. Morale is somewhere in the sub-basement. The pharmaceutical industry is begging for stability like a toddler asking for a bedtime routine. Marty Makary quit after repeated fights with the White House. Into this smoking wreckage, Trump has installed a political aide whose most touted skill is navigating his administration and staying on his good side. That's not a qualification for running a scientific agency. That's a job description for a different agency entirely — one that doesn't exist yet, but should, called the Department of Telling the President What He Wants to Hear.
Next stop: the Senate, where we will once again enjoy the beloved ritual of grave faces, furrowed brows, and "strong concerns" that evaporate the instant the roll call starts — the same strong concerns we saw right before they confirmed Blanche. Concerns without votes attached are just theater with better lighting. If the Senate confirms someone with this résumé gap and this record on vaccines anyway, they're not failing to notice the danger. They noticed it, wrote it down, and voted for it regardless.
Trump doesn't nominate people to protect the public from dangerous products or bad medical decisions. He nominates people to protect himself from expertise, disagreement, and consequences. Kennedy brings the conspiracy theories. Oz brings the television teeth. Overton brings political obedience gift-wrapped in a legitimate medical degree. It's a genuinely impressive trifecta, in the same way a car crash can be impressive if the car does three full rotations first.
I thought the bottom of the barrel had been reached a while ago. Turns out the barrel has a sub-basement, and Trump is still renovating.
The FDA doesn't need another loyalist, another culture warrior, or another physician willing to lend her degree's credibility to someone else's agenda. It needs a commissioner who treats evidence as non-negotiable, treats public health as something other than a loyalty test, and treats the American public as something other than a prop in somebody's ideological road show.







Contact
Questions or tips? Reach out anytime.
contact@leeboy.us
© 2026. All rights reserved. LeeBoy.us LLC - Lee Murphy


