THE ROBOTS ARE WATCHING YOU JAYWALK, AND THEY ARE VERY DISAPPOINTED

Picture, if you will, the future: you're walking down the street, minding your business, maybe eating a hot dog in a mildly untidy fashion, and somewhere a computer notices. Not a person. A computer. It clocks your face, cross-references your entire life, decides you are Up To No Good, and before you've even finished chewing, a message has been sent to a government database with your name on it, possibly followed by a very stern text message and, in some countries, your face on a billboard like you just won a contest nobody wants to win.

This is not science fiction. This is a Tuesday, apparently, in the very near future, according to security researcher Bruce Schneier and law professor Jon Penney, who wrote an essay warning that AI-powered surveillance is about to get "supercharged," which is the kind of word that used to describe muscle cars and now describes the thing watching you pick your nose at a red light.

Think of it as a speed camera, they explain, except instead of just catching you doing 47 in a 35, it catches you littering, jaywalking, shoplifting, and probably also judging your posture, and instead of a ticket arriving three weeks later looking apologetic in your mailbox, the fine arrives approximately instantly, like a waiter who's really eager to close out your table.

China, never a nation to do things halfway, has apparently installed something in the neighborhood of 600 million surveillance cameras, which works out to roughly one camera for every two people, meaning statistically you and your camera could just move in together and split rent. The system is good enough that when a man named Lao Duan — who'd fallen behind on some loans — wandered into a Beijing intersection, the city's AI recognized his face and put his name, photo, and ID number on a giant electronic billboard announcing to everyone within eyeshot that he was Not To Be Trusted, which is a genuinely insane way to find out you have bad credit. Most of us just get a strongly worded letter. Lao Duan got a Times Square moment, except the show was "You, But Untrustworthy."

And before anyone gets too comfortable pointing at China and saying "well, THAT'S dystopian," the article helpfully notes that this technology is spreading to North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa, because nothing says "global unity" quite like everybody independently deciding to build the same panopticon. Here in the U.S., a report found the Department of Homeland Security is ramping up AI surveillance — facial recognition, social media monitoring — aimed at immigrants, journalists, protesters, and legal observers, which is a group of people you'd think we'd want to be nervous about surveilling, and yet.

And then there's Larry Ellison, the Oracle CEO, who said the quiet part out loud with the enthusiasm of a man who has never once worried about being watched: "Citizens will be on their best behavior because we're constantly recording and reporting." Which is a sentence that reads less like a tech executive and more like a Bond villain who skipped the monologue-writing workshop and went straight to the volcano lair.

The authors argue the real danger isn't just bias or unaccountable systems — though sure, those too — it's the "chilling effect." That's the fancy term for what happens when people become so aware of being watched that they quietly stop doing anything interesting, weird, or brave, the same way you stop singing in the shower the moment you remember the walls are thin. Penney's got an entire book about this called "Chilling Effects," which is either a great title for a surveillance-state exposé or a mediocre title for an air conditioning company, and honestly at this point it could go either way.

Here's the part that should really get you: the authors point out that things like the normalization of same-sex relationships and marijuana didn't happen because everyone woke up one day with better morals baked in. They happened because people quietly, privately, sometimes illegally, lived their lives differently long enough that society eventually caught up. That entire process — the slow, messy, human business of testing new ideas in private before they're safe in public — requires actual privacy. Take away the private testing ground, and you don't just chill individual behavior, you potentially freeze social progress itself, mid-thaw, like a popsicle nobody gets to finish.

And here's the kicker: we don't even have a good historical comparison for this. Cold War East Germany's surveillance state and the FBI's 1950s wiretapping-and-index-cards operation against suspected communists both sound almost quaint by comparison — a bunch of guys in trench coats squinting at paper files versus an AI that never blinks, never sleeps, and never once considers taking a lunch break. Even Orwell's Big Brother, with his ominous telescreen, looks like a flip phone next to what's actually being built. George Orwell, ladies and gentlemen, undersold it. That takes some doing.

The good news, according to the authors, is that none of this is inevitable — we can still ban facial recognition, pass real privacy laws, regulate AI's more invasive uses, and break up the tech-and-government partnerships making all this possible. In other words: the future isn't written yet, it's just currently being drafted by people who really, really want to know what you're doing at 2 p.m. on a Wednesday.

So enjoy your hot dog while you still can. Chew mysteriously. Make it weird. It might be the last private act of rebellion you get.

Amazon Link to Book

Contact

Questions or tips? Reach out anytime.

Email

contact@leeboy.us

© 2026. All rights reserved. LeeBoy.us LLC - Lee Murphy